The development and increasing sophistication of automated underwriting systems (AUS) have transformed the mortgage industry significantly since the inception of the first AUS by Freddie Mac. Credit scores, particularly those provided by FICO, have been pivotal in assessing a borrower’s likelihood of mortgage delinquency. For years, FICO remained the dominant scoring model used by government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) when determining borrower risk, thereby establishing a standard in mortgage underwriting processes. However, the introduction of VantageScore has challenged FICO’s long-standing monopoly, presenting lenders with an alternative that could impact borrower evaluation methods. With the option to utilize either scoring model, lenders now face new dynamics in how they assess risk when delivering loans to the GSEs.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency’s (FHFA) policy change, which allows lenders to choose between FICO and VantageScore, has implications that extend beyond borrower assessment. This “lender choice” framework can create potential risks for both credit and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) investors. Variability in credit score usage can lead to inconsistencies in risk assessment across the board, raising concerns about the reliability of credit evaluations used in underwriting decisions. As lenders adapt to this dual-scoring system, the industry must uniformly address the potential ripple effects on loan performance, investor confidence, and overall market stability. In a landscape already characterized by fluctuations in economic conditions, the adoption of competing credit scoring models necessitates a reevaluation of risk management strategies to safeguard both lender interests and investor portfolios.
### Key Points:
– **Automated Underwriting Systems (AUS)**: Introduced by Freddie Mac, revolutionizing mortgage assessments.
– **FICO’s Dominance**: Historically the sole credit score provider for GSEs, crucial in predicting mortgage delinquency.
– **Emergence of VantageScore**: Provides competition to FICO, offering lenders an alternative for borrower evaluations.
– **FHFA’s “Lender Choice” Policy**: Allows lenders to use either credit scoring model, altering traditional mortgage underwriting practices.
– **Impact on Risk**: The dual-scoring option may introduce inconsistencies in risk assessments, posing challenges for credit and MBS investors.
You can read this full article at: https://www.housingwire.com/articles/looming-risk-for-mortgage-credit-and-mbs-investors-from-lender-choice/(subscription required)
Note Servicing Center provides professional, fully compliant loan servicing for private mortgage investors so they can avoid the aggravation of servicing their own loans and just relax and get paid. Contact us today for more information.
