The annual escrow analysis under §1024.17 is a mandated twelve-month projection that determines the borrower’s monthly escrow payment, reconciles actual versus projected balances, and generates a compliant statement for the borrower. Running it correctly requires four sequential steps: build the projection, compute the payment, reconcile at year-end, and deliver the statement within thirty days.

What is the computation year, and why does it matter?

The computation year is the twelve-month period the analysis covers. §1024.17(b) defines it as the period the servicer establishes at account opening. Most servicers align it with the calendar year or the loan anniversary. Every subsequent analysis runs on the same twelve-month cadence, and any change to the computation-year boundary requires a short-year analysis to reconcile the gap before the new cycle begins.

How do you build the disbursement projection for the next twelve months?

Pull the projected annual disbursements: property tax split by county installment schedule, homeowners insurance annual premium, flood insurance if applicable, mortgage insurance if applicable, and any other escrowed item the note requires. Plot each disbursement to the specific month it falls due. Add the projected monthly deposit and compute the running balance for each of the twelve months. The lowest projected month-end balance must equal the cushion permitted under §1024.17(c)(1)(ii) – up to one-sixth of projected annual disbursements.

How do you compute the monthly escrow payment?

Sum the projected annual disbursements and divide by twelve. Then add or subtract the adjustment needed to bring the lowest projected month-end balance to the target cushion. When the projection shows the lowest balance falling below cushion, increase the monthly payment by the shortage divided by twelve. When the lowest balance sits above cushion, decrease the monthly payment by the surplus divided by twelve. The aggregate method requires this single computation across all escrowed items – no item-by-item calculation.

How do you reconcile actual versus projected at year-end?

At the end of the computation year, pull the actual escrow balance from the ledger and compare it to the projected target balance computed in the prior year’s analysis. The difference is the surplus, shortage, or deficiency. A surplus at or above the statutory threshold set in §1024.17(f)(2), on a current account, triggers a refund to the borrower. A surplus below that threshold or on a non-current account carries forward to reduce future payments. A shortage triggers a repayment plan under §1024.17(f)(3). A deficiency triggers the cure procedures under §1024.17(f)(4).

How do you produce the analysis statement for the borrower?

§1024.17(i) and Appendix E specify the required format. The statement must show: the prior year’s projected disbursements and the actual disbursements, the surplus or shortage amount, the new monthly escrow payment, the next computation year’s projected disbursements with the specific month each is due, the cushion amount, and the borrower’s repayment schedule for any shortage. Most loan servicing platforms produce a §1024.17-compliant template natively. Deliver the completed statement to the borrower within thirty days of the analysis date.

What is the payment-change notice requirement?

When the analysis changes the borrower’s monthly payment, the servicer delivers both the analysis statement and a separate payment-change notice. The notice must reach the borrower at least fifteen days before the first changed payment is due. That window gives the borrower time to adjust the payment amount, contact the servicer with questions, or invoke a §1024.36 qualified written request to dispute the calculation.

How do you document the analysis for an examiner?

Retain four artifacts. First, the analysis worksheet showing the projection math, cushion calculation, and payment derivation. Second, the analysis statement delivered to the borrower. Third, the payment-change notice, if any. Fourth, the escrow ledger from the prior computation year tied to the custodial-account bank reconciliations. §1024.38(c) sets the minimum retention period; institutional best practice runs five to seven years.

Expert Take

The escrow analysis is the artifact examiners request first in any Regulation X review. Servicers who run the analysis on a fixed annual schedule – rather than reacting to disbursement changes ad hoc – consistently produce cleaner documentation and shorter exam cycles. The four retention artifacts are non-negotiable: a gap in any one of them converts a routine examination into a remediation conversation. President Standen has noted that servicers who automate the Appendix E statement output and tie it directly to the ledger reconciliation eliminate the category of error examiners find most frequently.

Related Topics

• 5 Things to Know About Escrow Account Setup for Private Mortgage Notes
• 5 Things to Know About the Escrow Disbursement Process for Private Mortgage Notes
• 10 Record-Keeping Requirements for Private Mortgage Note Servicers
• 9 Compliance Checkpoints for Private Mortgage Loan Servicers in 2026
• 7 Compliance Mistakes Private Lenders Make
• 1098 vs. 1099-INT: The Private Mortgage Tax Reporting Guide